Ramification group

Filtration of the Galois group of a local field extension

In number theory, more specifically in local class field theory, the ramification groups are a filtration of the Galois group of a local field extension, which gives detailed information on the ramification phenomena of the extension.

Ramification theory of valuations

In mathematics, the ramification theory of valuations studies the set of extensions of a valuation v of a field K to an extension L of K. It is a generalization of the ramification theory of Dedekind domains.[1][2]

The structure of the set of extensions is known better when L/K is Galois.

Decomposition group and inertia group

Let (Kv) be a valued field and let L be a finite Galois extension of K. Let Sv be the set of equivalence classes of extensions of v to L and let G be the Galois group of L over K. Then G acts on Sv by σ[w] = [w ∘ σ] (i.e. w is a representative of the equivalence class [w] ∈ Sv and [w] is sent to the equivalence class of the composition of w with the automorphism σ : LL; this is independent of the choice of w in [w]). In fact, this action is transitive.

Given a fixed extension w of v to L, the decomposition group of w is the stabilizer subgroup Gw of [w], i.e. it is the subgroup of G consisting of all elements that fix the equivalence class [w] ∈ Sv.

Let mw denote the maximal ideal of w inside the valuation ring Rw of w. The inertia group of w is the subgroup Iw of Gw consisting of elements σ such that σx ≡ x (mod mw) for all x in Rw. In other words, Iw consists of the elements of the decomposition group that act trivially on the residue field of w. It is a normal subgroup of Gw.

The reduced ramification index e(w/v) is independent of w and is denoted e(v). Similarly, the relative degree f(w/v) is also independent of w and is denoted f(v).

Ramification groups in lower numbering

Ramification groups are a refinement of the Galois group G {\displaystyle G} of a finite L / K {\displaystyle L/K} Galois extension of local fields. We shall write w , O L , p {\displaystyle w,{\mathcal {O}}_{L},{\mathfrak {p}}} for the valuation, the ring of integers and its maximal ideal for L {\displaystyle L} . As a consequence of Hensel's lemma, one can write O L = O K [ α ] {\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{L}={\mathcal {O}}_{K}[\alpha ]} for some α L {\displaystyle \alpha \in L} where O K {\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{K}} is the ring of integers of K {\displaystyle K} .[3] (This is stronger than the primitive element theorem.) Then, for each integer i 1 {\displaystyle i\geq -1} , we define G i {\displaystyle G_{i}} to be the set of all s G {\displaystyle s\in G} that satisfies the following equivalent conditions.

  • (i) s {\displaystyle s} operates trivially on O L / p i + 1 . {\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{L}/{\mathfrak {p}}^{i+1}.}
  • (ii) w ( s ( x ) x ) i + 1 {\displaystyle w(s(x)-x)\geq i+1} for all x O L {\displaystyle x\in {\mathcal {O}}_{L}}
  • (iii) w ( s ( α ) α ) i + 1. {\displaystyle w(s(\alpha )-\alpha )\geq i+1.}

The group G i {\displaystyle G_{i}} is called i {\displaystyle i} -th ramification group. They form a decreasing filtration,

G 1 = G G 0 G 1 { } . {\displaystyle G_{-1}=G\supset G_{0}\supset G_{1}\supset \dots \{*\}.}

In fact, the G i {\displaystyle G_{i}} are normal by (i) and trivial for sufficiently large i {\displaystyle i} by (iii). For the lowest indices, it is customary to call G 0 {\displaystyle G_{0}} the inertia subgroup of G {\displaystyle G} because of its relation to splitting of prime ideals, while G 1 {\displaystyle G_{1}} the wild inertia subgroup of G {\displaystyle G} . The quotient G 0 / G 1 {\displaystyle G_{0}/G_{1}} is called the tame quotient.

The Galois group G {\displaystyle G} and its subgroups G i {\displaystyle G_{i}} are studied by employing the above filtration or, more specifically, the corresponding quotients. In particular,

  • G / G 0 = Gal ( l / k ) , {\displaystyle G/G_{0}=\operatorname {Gal} (l/k),} where l , k {\displaystyle l,k} are the (finite) residue fields of L , K {\displaystyle L,K} .[4]
  • G 0 = 1 L / K {\displaystyle G_{0}=1\Leftrightarrow L/K} is unramified.
  • G 1 = 1 L / K {\displaystyle G_{1}=1\Leftrightarrow L/K} is tamely ramified (i.e., the ramification index is prime to the residue characteristic.)

The study of ramification groups reduces to the totally ramified case since one has G i = ( G 0 ) i {\displaystyle G_{i}=(G_{0})_{i}} for i 0 {\displaystyle i\geq 0} .

One also defines the function i G ( s ) = w ( s ( α ) α ) , s G {\displaystyle i_{G}(s)=w(s(\alpha )-\alpha ),s\in G} . (ii) in the above shows i G {\displaystyle i_{G}} is independent of choice of α {\displaystyle \alpha } and, moreover, the study of the filtration G i {\displaystyle G_{i}} is essentially equivalent to that of i G {\displaystyle i_{G}} .[5] i G {\displaystyle i_{G}} satisfies the following: for s , t G {\displaystyle s,t\in G} ,

  • i G ( s ) i + 1 s G i . {\displaystyle i_{G}(s)\geq i+1\Leftrightarrow s\in G_{i}.}
  • i G ( t s t 1 ) = i G ( s ) . {\displaystyle i_{G}(tst^{-1})=i_{G}(s).}
  • i G ( s t ) min { i G ( s ) , i G ( t ) } . {\displaystyle i_{G}(st)\geq \min\{i_{G}(s),i_{G}(t)\}.}

Fix a uniformizer π {\displaystyle \pi } of L {\displaystyle L} . Then s s ( π ) / π {\displaystyle s\mapsto s(\pi )/\pi } induces the injection G i / G i + 1 U L , i / U L , i + 1 , i 0 {\displaystyle G_{i}/G_{i+1}\to U_{L,i}/U_{L,i+1},i\geq 0} where U L , 0 = O L × , U L , i = 1 + p i {\displaystyle U_{L,0}={\mathcal {O}}_{L}^{\times },U_{L,i}=1+{\mathfrak {p}}^{i}} . (The map actually does not depend on the choice of the uniformizer.[6]) It follows from this[7]

  • G 0 / G 1 {\displaystyle G_{0}/G_{1}} is cyclic of order prime to p {\displaystyle p}
  • G i / G i + 1 {\displaystyle G_{i}/G_{i+1}} is a product of cyclic groups of order p {\displaystyle p} .

In particular, G 1 {\displaystyle G_{1}} is a p-group and G 0 {\displaystyle G_{0}} is solvable.

The ramification groups can be used to compute the different D L / K {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {D}}_{L/K}} of the extension L / K {\displaystyle L/K} and that of subextensions:[8]

w ( D L / K ) = s 1 i G ( s ) = i = 0 ( | G i | 1 ) . {\displaystyle w({\mathfrak {D}}_{L/K})=\sum _{s\neq 1}i_{G}(s)=\sum _{i=0}^{\infty }(|G_{i}|-1).}

If H {\displaystyle H} is a normal subgroup of G {\displaystyle G} , then, for σ G {\displaystyle \sigma \in G} , i G / H ( σ ) = 1 e L / K s σ i G ( s ) {\displaystyle i_{G/H}(\sigma )={1 \over e_{L/K}}\sum _{s\mapsto \sigma }i_{G}(s)} .[9]

Combining this with the above one obtains: for a subextension F / K {\displaystyle F/K} corresponding to H {\displaystyle H} ,

v F ( D F / K ) = 1 e L / F s H i G ( s ) . {\displaystyle v_{F}({\mathfrak {D}}_{F/K})={1 \over e_{L/F}}\sum _{s\not \in H}i_{G}(s).}

If s G i , t G j , i , j 1 {\displaystyle s\in G_{i},t\in G_{j},i,j\geq 1} , then s t s 1 t 1 G i + j + 1 {\displaystyle sts^{-1}t^{-1}\in G_{i+j+1}} .[10] In the terminology of Lazard, this can be understood to mean the Lie algebra gr ( G 1 ) = i 1 G i / G i + 1 {\displaystyle \operatorname {gr} (G_{1})=\sum _{i\geq 1}G_{i}/G_{i+1}} is abelian.

Example: the cyclotomic extension

The ramification groups for a cyclotomic extension K n := Q p ( ζ ) / Q p {\displaystyle K_{n}:=\mathbf {Q} _{p}(\zeta )/\mathbf {Q} _{p}} , where ζ {\displaystyle \zeta } is a p n {\displaystyle p^{n}} -th primitive root of unity, can be described explicitly:[11]

G s = Gal ( K n / K e ) , {\displaystyle G_{s}=\operatorname {Gal} (K_{n}/K_{e}),}

where e is chosen such that p e 1 s < p e {\displaystyle p^{e-1}\leq s<p^{e}} .

Example: a quartic extension

Let K be the extension of Q2 generated by x 1 = 2 + 2 {\displaystyle x_{1}={\sqrt {2+{\sqrt {2}}}}} . The conjugates of x 1 {\displaystyle x_{1}} are x 2 = 2 2 {\displaystyle x_{2}={\sqrt {2-{\sqrt {2}}}}} , x 3 = x 1 {\displaystyle x_{3}=-x_{1}} , x 4 = x 2 {\displaystyle x_{4}=-x_{2}} .

A little computation shows that the quotient of any two of these is a unit. Hence they all generate the same ideal; call it π. 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}} generates π2; (2)=π4.

Now x 1 x 3 = 2 x 1 {\displaystyle x_{1}-x_{3}=2x_{1}} , which is in π5.

and x 1 x 2 = 4 2 2 , {\displaystyle x_{1}-x_{2}={\sqrt {4-2{\sqrt {2}}}},} which is in π3.

Various methods show that the Galois group of K is C 4 {\displaystyle C_{4}} , cyclic of order 4. Also:

G 0 = G 1 = G 2 = C 4 . {\displaystyle G_{0}=G_{1}=G_{2}=C_{4}.}

and G 3 = G 4 = ( 13 ) ( 24 ) . {\displaystyle G_{3}=G_{4}=(13)(24).}

w ( D K / Q 2 ) = 3 + 3 + 3 + 1 + 1 = 11 , {\displaystyle w({\mathfrak {D}}_{K/Q_{2}})=3+3+3+1+1=11,} so that the different D K / Q 2 = π 11 {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {D}}_{K/Q_{2}}=\pi ^{11}}

x 1 {\displaystyle x_{1}} satisfies X4 − 4X2 + 2, which has discriminant 2048 = 211.

Ramification groups in upper numbering

If u {\displaystyle u} is a real number 1 {\displaystyle \geq -1} , let G u {\displaystyle G_{u}} denote G i {\displaystyle G_{i}} where i the least integer u {\displaystyle \geq u} . In other words, s G u i G ( s ) u + 1. {\displaystyle s\in G_{u}\Leftrightarrow i_{G}(s)\geq u+1.} Define ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } by[12]

ϕ ( u ) = 0 u d t ( G 0 : G t ) {\displaystyle \phi (u)=\int _{0}^{u}{dt \over (G_{0}:G_{t})}}

where, by convention, ( G 0 : G t ) {\displaystyle (G_{0}:G_{t})} is equal to ( G 1 : G 0 ) 1 {\displaystyle (G_{-1}:G_{0})^{-1}} if t = 1 {\displaystyle t=-1} and is equal to 1 {\displaystyle 1} for 1 < t 0 {\displaystyle -1<t\leq 0} .[13] Then ϕ ( u ) = u {\displaystyle \phi (u)=u} for 1 u 0 {\displaystyle -1\leq u\leq 0} . It is immediate that ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } is continuous and strictly increasing, and thus has the continuous inverse function ψ {\displaystyle \psi } defined on [ 1 , ) {\displaystyle [-1,\infty )} . Define G v = G ψ ( v ) {\displaystyle G^{v}=G_{\psi (v)}} . G v {\displaystyle G^{v}} is then called the v-th ramification group in upper numbering. In other words, G ϕ ( u ) = G u {\displaystyle G^{\phi (u)}=G_{u}} . Note G 1 = G , G 0 = G 0 {\displaystyle G^{-1}=G,G^{0}=G_{0}} . The upper numbering is defined so as to be compatible with passage to quotients:[14] if H {\displaystyle H} is normal in G {\displaystyle G} , then

( G / H ) v = G v H / H {\displaystyle (G/H)^{v}=G^{v}H/H} for all v {\displaystyle v}

(whereas lower numbering is compatible with passage to subgroups.)

Herbrand's theorem

Herbrand's theorem states that the ramification groups in the lower numbering satisfy G u H / H = ( G / H ) v {\displaystyle G_{u}H/H=(G/H)_{v}} (for v = ϕ L / F ( u ) {\displaystyle v=\phi _{L/F}(u)} where L / F {\displaystyle L/F} is the subextension corresponding to H {\displaystyle H} ), and that the ramification groups in the upper numbering satisfy G u H / H = ( G / H ) u {\displaystyle G^{u}H/H=(G/H)^{u}} .[15][16] This allows one to define ramification groups in the upper numbering for infinite Galois extensions (such as the absolute Galois group of a local field) from the inverse system of ramification groups for finite subextensions.

The upper numbering for an abelian extension is important because of the Hasse–Arf theorem. It states that if G {\displaystyle G} is abelian, then the jumps in the filtration G v {\displaystyle G^{v}} are integers; i.e., G i = G i + 1 {\displaystyle G_{i}=G_{i+1}} whenever ϕ ( i ) {\displaystyle \phi (i)} is not an integer.[17]

The upper numbering is compatible with the filtration of the norm residue group by the unit groups under the Artin isomorphism. The image of G n ( L / K ) {\displaystyle G^{n}(L/K)} under the isomorphism

G ( L / K ) a b K / N L / K ( L ) {\displaystyle G(L/K)^{\mathrm {ab} }\leftrightarrow K^{*}/N_{L/K}(L^{*})}

is just[18]

U K n / ( U K n N L / K ( L ) )   . {\displaystyle U_{K}^{n}/(U_{K}^{n}\cap N_{L/K}(L^{*}))\ .}

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Fröhlich, A.; Taylor, M.J. (1991). Algebraic number theory. Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics. Vol. 27. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36664-X. Zbl 0744.11001.
  2. ^ Zariski, Oscar; Samuel, Pierre (1976) [1960]. Commutative algebra, Volume II. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 29. New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Chapter VI. ISBN 978-0-387-90171-8. Zbl 0322.13001.
  3. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.178
  4. ^ since G / G 0 {\displaystyle G/G_{0}} is canonically isomorphic to the decomposition group.
  5. ^ Serre (1979) p.62
  6. ^ Conrad
  7. ^ Use U L , 0 / U L , 1 l × {\displaystyle U_{L,0}/U_{L,1}\simeq l^{\times }} and U L , i / U L , i + 1 l + {\displaystyle U_{L,i}/U_{L,i+1}\approx l^{+}}
  8. ^ Serre (1979) 4.1 Prop.4, p.64
  9. ^ Serre (1979) 4.1. Prop.3, p.63
  10. ^ Serre (1979) 4.2. Proposition 10.
  11. ^ Serre, Corps locaux. Ch. IV, §4, Proposition 18
  12. ^ Serre (1967) p.156
  13. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.179
  14. ^ Serre (1967) p.155
  15. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.180
  16. ^ Serre (1979) p.75
  17. ^ Neukirch (1999) p.355
  18. ^ Snaith (1994) pp.30-31

References

  • B. Conrad, Math 248A. Higher ramification groups
  • Fröhlich, A.; Taylor, M.J. (1991). Algebraic number theory. Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics. Vol. 27. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36664-X. Zbl 0744.11001.
  • Neukirch, Jürgen (1999). Algebraische Zahlentheorie. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 322. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-65399-8. MR 1697859. Zbl 0956.11021.
  • Serre, Jean-Pierre (1967). "VI. Local class field theory". In Cassels, J.W.S.; Fröhlich, A. (eds.). Algebraic number theory. Proceedings of an instructional conference organized by the London Mathematical Society (a NATO Advanced Study Institute) with the support of the International Mathematical Union. London: Academic Press. pp. 128–161. Zbl 0153.07403.
  • Serre, Jean-Pierre (1979). Local Fields. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 67. Translated by Greenberg, Marvin Jay. Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-90424-7. MR 0554237. Zbl 0423.12016.
  • Snaith, Victor P. (1994). Galois module structure. Fields Institute monographs. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 0-8218-0264-X. Zbl 0830.11042.