Hollingsworth lwn. Perry

Hollingsworth lwn. Perry
Mahkamah Agung Amerika Syarikat
Dihujah 26 Mac, 2013 Berkeputusan 26 Jun, 2013
Nama penuh kes	Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Petitioners v. Kristin M. Perry, et al.
No. doket	[[[:Templat:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 12-144]
Perdebatan	Hujah lisan
Keahlian mahkamah
Ketua Hakim Hakim Berkaitan
Pendapat kes
Majoriti	Roberts, diikuti oleh Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan
Perbezaan pendapat	Kennedy, diikuti Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor
Undang-undang digunakan
Perkara Tiga Perlembagaan Amerika Syarikat

Hollingsworth lwn. Perry (Bahasa Inggeris: Hollingsworth v. Perry) ialah sejumlah kes di mahkamah persekutuan Amerika Syarikat yang membenarkan perkahwinan sejenis di negeri California. Kes ini bermula pada tahun 2009 di mahkamah daerah utara California yang memutuskan bahawa larangan perkahwinan sejenis melanggar asas perlindungan yang sama di hadapan hukum. Keputusan ini dibatalkan oleh inisiatif referendum Proposition 8 yang telah melarang perkahwinan sejenis. Setelah negeri California enggan mempertahankan Proposition 8, penyokong rasmi Proposition 8 masuk campur dan mengemukakan rayuan. Kes ini dipertimbangkan selama tempoh jawatan gabenor Arnold Schwarzenegger dan Jerry Brown, sehingga kes ini juga dikenali dengan nama Perry lwn. Schwarzenegger dan Perry lwn. Brown. Kes Hollingsworth lwn. Perry pada akhirnya mencapai Mahkamah Agung Amerika Syarikat, dan mahkamah tersebut memutuskan bahawa penyokong inisiatif referendum itu tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum untuk mengajukan banding ketika negara bahagian menolak melakukan hal tersebut, kerana mereka tidak dapat menunjukkan bahawa mereka telah dirugikan oleh keputusan iti.^[1]

• Eskridge, William N., Jr. (2012). "The Ninth Circuit's Perry Decision and the Constitutional Politics of Marriage Equality". Stanford Law Review Online. 64: 93–98.
• Rosky, Clifford J. (2011). "Perry v. Schwarzenegger and the Future of Same-Sex Marriage Law" (PDF). Arizona Law Review. 53 (3): 913–983.
• West, Robin L. (2012). "A Marriage is a Marriage is a Marriage: The Limits of Perry v. Brown". Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-027. SSRN 2020293.

• American Foundation for Equal Rights, organization that filed the lawsuit.
• Protect Marriage, sponsors of Proposition 8.
• Equality on Trial, coverage and analysis of the trial.
• Post-DOMA and Post-Prop 8 Facts Sheets, Lambda Legal, June 28, 2013.
• Proposition 8's long and winding road to legal defeat Diarkibkan 2013-07-20 di archive.today by Maura Dolan from the Los Angeles Times on July 6, 2013.

• U.S. District Court official case site
• U.S. Ninth Circuit official case site
• U.S. District Court trial video re-enactment

• Tulisan Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693 (2013) (Supreme Court decision) boleh didapati dari:  Justia  Oyez (oral argument audio)  Supreme Court (slip opinion) 
• Judge Vaughn Walker's U.S. District Court decision
• Ninth Circuit decision (vacated by U.S. Supreme Court)
• Ninth Circuit order lifting stay
• Archive of Amicus Curiae: San Francisco Attorney General
• Legal Filings: American Foundation for Equal Rights
• Legal Filings: Justia Dockets
• U.S. District Court trial evidence
• Judge Ware decision to release trial video tapes
• Ninth Circuit decision to seal trial video tapes
• Petition for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court: Sponsors of Proposition 8

• "The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage", Theodore B. Olson, Newsweek, January 19, 2010
• Theodore Olson and David Boies discuss the trial, evidence, and legal approach with journalist Bill Moyers on PBS, February 26, 2010.
• "Marriage Equality in America after the Supreme Court Ruling," NPR journalist Steve Inskeep discusses the history and outcomes of the two landmark same-sex marriage cases with David Boies, posted by the Aspen Institute on July 12, 2013.